The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk is a tool healthcare professionals use to assess a patient's risk of developing pressure ulcers. By evaluating specific criteria such as sensory perception, moisture, activity, mobility, nutrition, and friction and shear, it assigns a numerical value to determine the level of risk, ranging from mild to severe. Ensuring this form is meticulously completed can significantly influence the care plan devised for individuals in various healthcare settings.
To better protect patients from the dangers of pressure injuries, it is crucial to understand and accurately fill out the Braden Scale. Click the button below to start the assessment process and contribute to the prevention of these detrimental sores.
The Braden Scale is a meticulously designed instrument employed to predict the risk of pressure sores in patients, providing healthcare professionals with a methodical approach to assess and mitigate the potential for these wounds.The form categorizes risk into four levels—severe, high, moderate, and mild—based on a total score derived from evaluating six critical factors: sensory perception, moisture, activity, mobility, nutrition, and friction and shear. Sensory perception assesses a patient's ability to respond to pressure-related discomfort, highlighting those completely limited in their response due to factors such as a diminished level of consciousness or sedation. Moisture examines the skin's exposure to wetness, which can greatly exacerbate sore development. The activity category considers the patient's ability to change positions, which is crucial in preventing pressure sores. Mobility grades the patient's capacity to alter and control body position without assistance. Nutrition is assessed to ensure the patient is receiving adequate sustenance, vital for healing and maintaining skin integrity. Lastly, friction and shear evaluate the potential for skin damage due to movement. With a total score indicating the patient's risk level, the Braden Scale serves as an essential guide in the development of care plans geared towards the prevention of pressure sores, underscoring the importance of early and tailored interventions.
BRADEN SCALE – For Predicting Pressure Sore Risk
SEVERE RISK: Total score 9
HIGH RISK: Total score 10-12
DATE OF
MODERATE RISK: Total score 13-14
MILD RISK: Total score 15-18
ASSESS
RISK FACTOR
SCORE/DESCRIPTION
1
2
3
4
SENSORY
1. COMPLETELY
2. VERY LIMITED –
3. SLIGHTLY LIMITED –
4. NO IMPAIRMENT –
PERCEPTION
LIMITED – Unresponsive
Responds only to painful
Responds to verbal
Ability to respond
(does not moan, flinch, or
stimuli. Cannot
commands but cannot
commands. Has no
meaningfully to
grasp) to painful stimuli,
communicate discomfort
always communicate
sensory deficit which
pressure-related
due to diminished level of
except by moaning or
discomfort or need to be
would limit ability to feel
discomfort
consciousness or
restlessness,
turned,
or voice pain or
sedation,
OR
discomfort.
has a sensory impairment
has some sensory
limited ability to feel pain
which limits the ability to
impairment which limits
over most of body
feel pain or discomfort
ability to feel pain or
surface.
over ½ of body.
discomfort in 1 or 2
extremities.
MOISTURE
1. CONSTANTLY
2. OFTEN MOIST – Skin
3. OCCASIONALLY
4. RARELY MOIST – Skin
Degree to which
MOIST– Skin is kept
is often but not always
MOIST – Skin is
is usually dry; linen only
skin is exposed to
moist almost constantly
moist. Linen must be
occasionally moist,
requires changing at
moisture
by perspiration, urine,
changed at least once a
requiring an extra linen
routine intervals.
etc. Dampness is detected
shift.
change approximately
every time patient is
once a day.
moved or turned.
ACTIVITY
1. BEDFAST – Confined
2. CHAIRFAST – Ability
3. WALKS
4. WALKS
Degree of physical
to bed.
to walk severely limited
OCCASIONALLY – Walks
FREQUENTLY– Walks
activity
or nonexistent. Cannot
occasionally during day,
outside the room at least
bear own weight and/or
but for very short
twice a day and inside
must be assisted into
distances, with or without
room at least once every
chair or wheelchair.
assistance. Spends
2 hours during waking
majority of each shift in
hours.
bed or chair.
MOBILITY
4. NO LIMITATIONS –
Ability to change
IMMOBILE – Does not
Makes occasional slight
Makes frequent though
Makes major and
and control body
make even slight changes
changes in body or
slight changes in body or
frequent changes in
position
in body or extremity
extremity position but
extremity position
position without
unable to make frequent
independently.
assistance.
or significant changes
NUTRITION
1. VERY POOR – Never
2. PROBABLY
3. ADEQUATE – Eats
4. EXCELLENT – Eats
Usual food intake
eats a complete meal.
INADEQUATE – Rarely
over half of most meals.
most of every meal.
pattern
Rarely eats more than 1/3
eats a complete meal and
Eats a total of 4 servings
Never refuses a meal.
1NPO: Nothing by
of any food offered. Eats
generally eats only about
of protein (meat, dairy
Usually eats a total of 4 or
2 servings or less of
½ of any food offered.
products) each day.
more servings of meat
mouth.
protein (meat or dairy
Protein intake includes
Occasionally refuses a
and dairy products.
2IV: Intravenously.
products) per day. Takes
only 3 servings of meat or
meal, but will usually take
Occasionally eats
3TPN: Total
fluids poorly. Does not
dairy products per day.
a supplement if offered,
between meals. Does not
parenteral
take a liquid dietary
Occasionally will take a
require supplementation.
nutrition.
supplement,
dietary supplement
is on a tube feeding or
TPN3 regimen, which
is NPO1 and/or
receives less than
probably meets most of
maintained on clear
optimum amount of
nutritional needs.
liquids or IV2 for more
liquid diet or tube
than 5 days.
feeding.
FRICTION AND
1. PROBLEM- Requires
2. POTENTIAL
3. NO APPARENT
SHEAR
moderate to maximum
PROBLEM– Moves
PROBLEM – Moves in
assistance in moving.
feebly or requires
bed and in chair
Complete lifting without
minimum assistance.
independently and has
sliding against sheets is
During a move, skin
sufficient muscle strength
impossible. Frequently
probably slides to some
to lift up completely
slides down in bed or
extent against sheets,
during move. Maintains
chair, requiring frequent
chair, restraints, or other
good position in bed or
repositioning with
devices. Maintains
chair at all times.
maximum assistance.
relatively good position in
Spasticity, contractures,
chair or bed most of the
or agitation leads to
time but occasionally
almost constant friction.
slides down.
TOTAL
Total score of 12 or less represents HIGH RISK
SCORE
ASSESS
DATE
EVALUATOR SIGNATURE/TITLE
ASSESS.
/
NAME-Last
First
Middle
Attending Physician
Record No.
Room/Bed
Form 3166P BRIGGS, Des Moines, IA 50306 (800) 247-2343 www.BriggsCorp.com
R304
PRINTED IN U.S.A
Source: Barbara Braden and Nancy Bergstrom. Copyright, 1988.
BRADEN SCALE
Reprinted with permission. Permission should be sought to use this
tool at www.bradenscale.com
Use the form only for the approved purpose. Any use of the form in publications (other than internal policy manuals and training material) or for profit-making ventures requires additional permission and/or negotiation.
Filling out the Braden Scale form is a straightforward process that helps healthcare professionals assess an individual’s risk of developing pressure sores. This assessment is crucial in planning preventive measures to ensure patient well-being. After completing the form, which categorizes risk from severe to mild based on total scores, healthcare providers can develop a tailored care strategy to mitigate pressure sore risks. Follow these steps carefully to ensure an accurate evaluation.
Once the Braden Scale form is completed, it's essential to interpret the scores accurately and implement appropriate care strategies tailored to the patient's specific needs. Regular monitoring and reassessment will further ensure the patient’s safety and comfort, effectively minimizing the risk of pressure sores.
What is the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk?
The Braden Scale is a widely accepted tool used in healthcare to help predict the risk of developing pressure sores (also known as pressure ulcers or bedsores). This tool assesses a patient's risk level based on six criteria: sensory perception, moisture, activity, mobility, nutrition, and friction and shear. Each category is scored, and the total score categorizes individuals into one of four risk levels: severe, high, moderate, or mild risk.
How does the scoring system work on the Braden Scale?
In the Braden Scale, each of the six factors evaluated is assigned a score from 1 to 4, with 1 indicating the most unfavorable condition and 4 representing the least risk. After assessing each category, the scores are summed up to determine the patient's total score. A lower total score indicates a higher risk for pressure sore development. Specifically, a score of 9 or lower signifies severe risk, 10-12 indicates high risk, 13-14 suggests moderate risk, and 15-18 points to mild risk.
What factors are assessed in the Braden Scale?
The factors assessed include Sensory Perception (ability to respond to pressure-related discomfort), Moisture (degree of skin exposure to moisture), Activity (degree of physical activity), Mobility (ability to change and control body position), Nutrition (usual food intake pattern), and Friction and Shear (degree to which the skin is exposed to the moving forces).
Who should be assessed using the Braden Scale?
Patients who are admitted to hospitals or long-term care facilities should be assessed using the Braden Scale, especially those who are bed-bound, have limited mobility, or exhibit other risk factors for pressure sore development. Regular assessments can also benefit individuals receiving home care who are at risk of developing pressure sores.
How often should the Braden Scale assessment be performed?
The frequency of assessment with the Braden Scale may vary depending on the individual's health condition and risk factors, but it is generally recommended upon admission to a healthcare facility, whenever the patient's condition changes, and on a routine basis for at-risk patients, often every 24-48 hours.
Can the Braden Scale prevent pressure sores?
While the Braden Scale itself does not prevent pressure sores, it is a crucial tool in identifying individuals at risk. Early identification allows healthcare providers to implement targeted preventative measures, such as repositioning, using special mattresses, and ensuring proper nutrition and skin care, thus significantly reducing the risk of pressure sore development.
Is the Braden Scale suitable for all age groups?
Yes, the Braden Scale can be used for adults and elderly patients. However, adaptations of the scale may be necessary for pediatric patients, as children have different physiological responses and pressure sore risk factors compared to adults.
What role does nutrition play in the Braden Scale assessment?
Nutrition is a critical component of the Braden Scale assessment. Adequate nutrition supports skin integrity and enhances the body's ability to resist and recover from pressure sores. The nutrition category assesses the patient's usual food intake pattern, considering both the quantity and quality of intake, including protein consumption.
How is the "Friction and Shear" category assessed in the Braden Scale?
The "Friction and Shear" category evaluates the degree to which a patient's skin is exposed to dragging or sliding forces, which can significantly increase the risk of skin breakdown and pressure sore formation. This category considers whether the patient can move independently without causing skin damage and whether assistance is needed to prevent friction and shear injuries.
One common mistake when filling out the Braden Scale form is inaccurately assessing a patient's sensory perception. Individuals may inaccurately categorize a patient under "no impairment" when, in reality, the patient exhibits slight or very limited response to stimulus due to a lack of thorough assessment. This error typically occurs because of a misunderstanding of the patient's response levels or a failure to properly test and engage with the patient to determine their true ability to respond to verbal commands or physical stimuli.
Another error involves the moisture category, where there is often a misjudgment about the degree to which the skin is exposed to moisture. Caregivers might select "rarely moist" based on superficial assessments, overlooking signs of occasional or frequent moisture that requires more attention. This mistake usually results from not checking the patient frequently enough or failing to recognize the importance of slight dampness in increasing the risk of pressure sores.
A further common mistake is misclassifying a patient's level of activity. For example, incorrectly marking a patient as "walks occasionally" when their mobility is severely limited to being "chairfast" can greatly affect the care plan devised for pressure sore prevention. This misclassification often stems from an optimistic but unrealistic appraisal of the patient's mobility or a lack of observation on how often the patient actually engages in physical activity throughout the day.
Lastly, inaccuracies in evaluating nutrition intake are widespread. There might be a tendency to overestimate the amount of food and specifically protein the patient consumes, leading to a classification of "adequate" or "excellent" nutrition where "probably inadequate" would be more accurate. Such errors typically occur when caregivers do not properly monitor the patient's actual intake during meals or fail to account for the nutritional value of the food consumed, especially in cases where the patient refuses meals or relies on supplements.
When healthcare professionals use the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk, a comprehensive assessment is crucial. This tool effectively estimates the risk of a patient developing pressure sores, but it’s often part of a larger documentation process that ensures a detailed care plan. Alongside the Braden Scale, various other forms and documents are typically utilized to tailor patient care, monitor progress, and ensure compliance with healthcare standards. Understanding these associated documents can better illuminate the holistic approach to patient management.
In addition to the Braden Scale, these documents play a vital role in a patient's care journey, highlighting the importance of a detailed and integrated approach to healthcare. By leveraging these various forms, healthcare professionals can ensure a thorough assessment, effective risk management, and optimal patient outcomes. Each document contributes to a holistic understanding of the patient, enabling targeted interventions and fostering a safe, healing environment.
The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk is a specialized tool used primarily in healthcare settings to assess the risk of a patient developing pressure ulcers. However, its structure and purpose share similarities with various other assessment forms used across different disciplines. Here are nine documents that are somewhat similar to the Braden Scale in either format, function, or both.
One similar document is the Fall Risk Assessment Tool. Like the Braden Scale, this tool evaluates several risk factors to determine a patient's likelihood of experiencing a fall. Both tools are used routinely in healthcare to initiate preventive measures based on the assessed risk. The difference lies in the nature of the risk being assessed—pressure ulcers versus falls—but the conceptual approach of scoring based on risk factors is a common thread.
Similarly, the Morse Fall Scale also assesses the risk of falls but uses different criteria. The similarity between this and the Braden Scale underscores the healthcare industry's reliance on standardized assessments to guide care plans. Both scales aim to quantify risk, thereby enabling healthcare professionals to implement targeted interventions.
The Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002) is another document that parallels the Braden Scale. It assesses nutritional risk instead of pressure sore risk, focusing on factors like food intake and the impact of current medical conditions on nutritional status. Both documents guide the clinical team in identifying and addressing specific risks.
The Glasgow Coma Scale is used to assess a patient’s conscious state following a head injury. Although it evaluates a completely different aspect of patient care, the structured approach to risk assessment through scoring is very similar to the Braden Scale. Each assigns numerical values to observations, culminating in a score that dictates the level of risk or severity.
Another document with similarities is the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), which evaluates cognitive impairment. Like the Braden Scale, it employs a scoring system to categorize levels of risk or impairment, guiding healthcare providers in patient care planning.
The Barthel Index measures a patient's level of independence in daily activities, reflecting the Braden Scale’s focus on assessing risk by examining functional capabilities. Although the Barthel Index is more focused on physical disabilities, both forms play a critical role in developing patient-centered care plans.
The Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) is used to monitor hospitalized patients for early signs of deterioration. It shares with the Braden Scale a predictive nature, albeit in a broader clinical context. Both tools are proactive, aiming to intervene before adverse outcomes occur.
A Pressure Ulcer Assessment Tool is another document that closely aligns with the Braden Scale but focuses more on the current state of skin integrity rather than predicting future risk. Despite this difference, both are essential in the management and prevention of pressure ulcers, complementing each other in patient care.
Last but not least, the DECUBITUS Risk Assessment Scale, like the Braden Scale, is specifically designed to evaluate the risk of pressure ulcers but from a slightly different perspective or using alternative criteria. Both scales underscore the importance of risk assessment in preventive healthcare, particularly in managing pressure ulcers among the vulnerable population.
Collectively, these documents illustrate a broader trend in healthcare and other fields: the use of standardized assessment tools to quantify risk or impairment, guide interventions, and ultimately improve outcomes. The Braden Scale represents one of many such tools, each tailored to specific risks and patient needs.
When filling out the Braden Scale for predicting pressure sore risk, ensuring accuracy and a thorough understanding of the patient's condition is essential. Here are nine critical do’s and don'ts to guide you through the process:
Carefully following these guidelines will help ensure that the Braden Scale is filled out accurately and effectively, providing valuable insights into the patient’s pressure sore risk and contributing to better patient care.
The Braden Scale form is a widely recognized tool used by healthcare professionals to assess the risk of pressure ulcers in patients, especially those who are bedridden or have limited mobility. Yet, despite its prevalent use, there are several misconceptions surrounding its usage and interpretation. Let’s explore seven common myths.
Understanding the nuances and correct application of the Braden Scale form is vital for accurate pressure ulcer risk assessment. Clearing up these misconceptions is a step toward better preventive care and patient outcomes.
The Braden Scale is an essential tool for healthcare professionals to evaluate the risk of pressure sores in patients, particularly those who are immobilized or have limited mobility. Understanding and utilizing the Braden Scale effectively can lead to improved patient outcomes by identifying at-risk individuals early and implementing preventive measures. Here are five key takeaways for filling out and using the Braden Scale form:
By prioritizing these key takeaways when using the Braden Scale, healthcare professionals can proactively identify patients at risk of pressure sores, allocate resources effectively, and implement preventive measures to maintain skin integrity and improve patient quality of life.
Carrs - Membership in the Carrs Plus/Safeway Club opens the door to exclusive discounts and offers.
It 2 - Providing specific instructions for filers with foreign earned income ensures inclusion and accurate reporting of all taxable income.
Birth Certificate Translation Template - Designed for clarity and precision, our translation form ensures your Spanish birth certificate is fully understood in English.