Free Da 1059 Form in PDF

Instructions on Writing Da 1059

Filling out a DA Form 1059, Service School Academic Evaluation Report, is a straightforward but crucial process that ensures a comprehensive assessment of a service member's performance during an assigned course. This form plays a vital role in evaluating the individual's competencies, directly influencing their career trajectory within the military. It captures not only the learner's academic and leadership abilities but also their potential for future responsibilities. Following a step-by-step guide will simplify the completion process.

1. Start with the basic information section: enter the date in the format YYYYMMDD in the designated field at the top right corner of the form.
2. Fill out the service member's name in the following format: LAST NAME - FIRST NAME - MIDDLE INITIAL.
3. Enter the service member's Social Security Number (SSN) in the designated field.
4. Input the grade of the service member in the field labeled "GRADE."
5. In the "BR" (Branch) field, specify the branch of service.
6. For "SPECIALTY/MOSC" (Military Occupational Specialty Code), write the service member's specialty.
7. Indicate the "COURSE TITLE" the service member attended.
8. Enter the "NAME OF SCHOOL" where the course was completed.
9. In the "COMP" (Component) field, specify the component of the service member.
10. For a referred report, check either "YES" or "NO" in response to whether you wish to make comments.
11. Under "DURATION OF COURSE," input the start and end dates in the format YYYYMMDD.
12. In the "PERFORMANCE SUMMARY" section, assess the service member's performance according to the available categories (Written Communication, Oral Communication, Leadership Skills, Contribution to Group Work, Evaluation of Student's Research Ability) by marking the appropriate box.
13. Determine whether the student has demonstrated the academic potential for selection to higher-level schooling/training, marking "YES," "NO," or "N/A" accordingly. Remember, a "NO" response requires supporting comments in the following item.
14. Provide detailed comments in "ITEM 14" to support any superior or unsatisfactory ratings given, or if you marked "NO" for academic potential for higher-level opportunities. This is crucial for a comprehensive evaluation.
15. For authentication:
    1. Type the name, grade, branch, and title of the rater, and then sign and date the report.
    2. Repeat this process for the reviewing officer in the next field.
    3. Finally, have the rated soldier sign and date the form.

Once completed, this form should be reviewed for accuracy before submission. It embodies a key component of the professional development and evaluation process within the military, offering insights into the service member's achievements and areas for improvement. Proper completion and timely submission of the DA Form 1059 ensure a transparent and effective evaluation process, contributing to the individual's career progression.

What is a DA Form 1059, and when is it used?

A DA Form 1059, known as the Service School Academic Evaluation Report, is a document utilized by the United States Army. It plays a crucial role in the evaluation of a soldier's performance during military schooling or training programs. This form captures detailed information about the individual's performance, including leadership skills, written and oral communication abilities, contributions to group work, and research capabilities. It is specifically employed upon the completion of such educational programs to provide feedback and to assess the soldier's potential for future schooling or training at a higher level.

Who completes the DA Form 1059?

The DA Form 1059 is filled out by a combination of individuals involved in the soldier's training process. Initially, the course instructor or the person responsible for the soldier's training performance will fill out the majority of the evaluation details, including the assessment of various skills and competencies. Furthermore, a reviewing officer, often a higher-ranking officer than the rater, provides additional oversight and authentication of the report. Lastly, the soldier being evaluated also signs the form, acknowledging receipt and the opportunity to review the assessment.

Are soldiers allowed to comment on their DA Form 1059 evaluation?

Yes, soldiers are given the opportunity to comment on their evaluation. Specifically, the form inquires whether the soldier wishes to make comments if the report is a referred report, which typically implies areas of concern or substandard performance. This process allows for a two-way communication channel, ensuring that the evaluated soldier has a means to voice any concerns, disagreements, or clarifications regarding their evaluation.

How does the DA Form 1059 affect a soldier's career?

The DA Form 1059 can significantly impact a soldier's military career, as it becomes a part of their official military personnel file (OMPF). High-performing individuals may see positive effects, such as recommendations for advanced training, promotions, and increased responsibilities. Conversely, a less favorable evaluation may signal areas needing improvement or potentially hinder progress towards career advancement. It essentially serves as a formal record that influences future opportunities and decisions within the Army.

What happens if a soldier receives an unsatisfactory evaluation on their DA Form 1059?

If a soldier receives an unsatisfactory evaluation, it doesn't necessarily signify the end of career advancement opportunities but does highlight areas needing improvement. Recommendations might be made for remedial training or development programs to address identified weaknesses. Additionally, comments from the rater and the reviewing officer, as required on the form for unsatisfactory ratings, can provide the soldier with specific feedback on how to improve. Soldiers have the option to discuss their evaluation with their superiors and seek advice on enhancing their performance, setting a course for recovery and future success.

Filling out the DA 1059 Form, the Service School Academic Evaluation Report, often involves critical errors that can affect the accuracy and integrity of the evaluation. One common mistake is providing incorrect personal information in sections 1 through 5. These sections require the correct last name, first name, middle initial, social security number (SSN), grade, branch (BR), and specialty/MOSC. Accurate information ensures the evaluation is attributed to the proper individual.

Another oversight is in the duration of the course section (item 10), where individuals either enter incorrect dates or format the dates improperly. The correct format as stated on the form is YYYYMMDD for both the 'From' and 'Thru' sections. This precise timeframe is crucial for record-keeping and for assessing the course's impact over the specific period attended.

Inaccuracies or omissions in the performance summary (item 11) and demonstrated abilities sections (item 12) are also common. Evaluators might mistakenly constrain student accomplishments to limited descriptors without providing a comprehensive view of the student’s abilities. Ensuring that all relevant fields are evaluated and that exceptional or unsatisfactory performances are supported by comments in item 14 is essential for a fair assessment.

A significant error occurs when the responder fails to appropriately indicate whether the student is recommended for higher level schooling/training (item 13). A "No" response requires justification through comments in item 14, which is often overlooked. This omission can result in an incomplete evaluation, potentially hindering the student’s future opportunities.

The comments section (item 14) is frequently underutilized. This section is intended for elaboration on superior or unsatisfactory ratings and justifying recommendations against further schooling. Leaving this section blank or barely filled misses an opportunity to provide a nuanced and useful feedback for the student’s development.

Error in the authentication section (item 15), including the typed name, grade, branch, and title of the rater, and the reviewing officer, alongside the signatures and dates, compromises the form's credibility. Each signature and date verify the accuracy and confirm the assessment's completion by authorized personnel. Neglecting these details can undermine the entire evaluation’s validity.

Oftentimes, people incorrectly answer whether the report is referred (item 9), without understanding its implications. A referred report, indicating a significant deficiency or failure, requires a deliberate choice and justification throughout the form, particularly in the comments section.

Last, overlooking the latest edition of the form can also lead to mistakes. Using an outdated version, which might not have current items or instructions (as indicated by the form saying "PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE"), might result in the submission of an invalid report. Always using the most recent version ensures compliance with current Army regulations and requirements.

When handling the DA Form 1059, the Service School Academic Evaluation Report, it's crucial to gather and complete several other forms and documents to ensure a comprehensive evaluation and record-keeping process for military personnel. These documents often serve as complementary pieces, enhancing the overall assessment and administrative procedures within military educational environments.

• DA Form 1045: Army Officer Evaluation Reports - This form is used to evaluate an officer's performance and potential. It's critical for promotions, assignments, and specialized training opportunities.
• DA Form 4856: Developmental Counseling Form - Often used in conjunction with the DA 1059, this form documents counseling sessions between leaders and their subordinates, focusing on performance improvements and professional development.
• DA Form 4187: Personnel Action - This form is essential for requesting personnel actions on an individual's military records, including school applications, reassignments, special training, and updates to personal information that might affect the academic evaluation process.
• DD Form 214: Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty - While not directly related to academic performance, it serves as a comprehensive summary of a service member's military career, including education and training received, which complements the academic evaluation report.
• DA Form 638: Recommendation for Award - Utilized to recommend individuals for awards based on meritorious service or achievements, including outstanding performance in academic settings, reinforcing the evaluations made in the DA 1059.
• DA Form 87: Certificate of Training - This document officially records the completion of a course, including the course title, date, and duration, serving as proof of the training and education evaluated in the DA 1059.

Together, these documents form a comprehensive suite that supports the educational and career management process for service members in the U.S. military. By ensuring these documents are accurately completed and filed alongside the DA Form 1059, military personnel and their supervisors can maintain an effective record of performance, training, and development activities.

The DA 268 Form, known as the "Report to Suspend Favorable Personnel Actions (Flag)," is quite similar to the DA 1059 in terms of its role in tracking individual performance and status within the Army. While the DA 1059 evaluates academic performance in service schools, the DA 268 is used to flag personnel who may be ineligible for promotions, reenlistments, or certain assignments due to disciplinary issues or other concerns. Both forms serve as formal records that impact a service member's career advancement.

The NCO Evaluation Report, facilitated by DA Form 2166-9, shares a common purpose with the DA 1059 by providing a structured evaluation of an individual's performance. Rather than focusing on academic achievements, it assesses leadership qualities, duties performed, and overall effectiveness as an NCO (Non-Commissioned Officer). Both documents are instrumental in decision-making processes related to promotions, assignments, and professional development within the Army.

The DA Form 4187, known as "Personnel Action," resembles the DA 1059 in its administrative function but serves a broader set of purposes, including requests for reassignments, extra rations, name changes, and other personnel actions. Like the DA 1059, it plays a critical role in documenting individual circumstances and requests that affect career progression and personal records in the military.

The Officer Evaluation Report (OER), executed through various DA forms depending on the rank of the officer being evaluated, parallels the DA 1059 in its goal to assess and document military personnel's performance and potential. While the DA 1059 is specific to academic settings, OERs cover a wide range of leadership and operational roles, providing a comprehensive view of an officer's capabilities and achievements.

The Academic Evaluation Report (AER) for ROTC Cadets, which might not have a specific DA form number like the DA 1059, performs a similar function for cadets in Reserve Officers' Training Corps programs. It evaluates cadets' academic performance, leadership, and physical fitness, contributing to decisions about their future commissions in the U.S. Army. Both forms ensure that individuals are evaluated fairly and systematically, with documented records to support educational and career milestones.

The DA Form 3349, or "Physical Profile," while focused on physical fitness rather than academic performance, shares similarities with the DA 1059 in its purpose to document individual profiles within the Army. The DA 3349 records any physical limitations that might affect a service member's duty assignments, much like how the DA 1059 documents academic and leadership qualities affecting career progression.

Lastly, the DA Form 638, “Recommendation for Award,” though primarily focused on recognizing achievements and outstanding service, shares a commonality with the DA 1059 in its objective to formally document individual accomplishments. While the DA 638 is used to nominate personnel for medals and awards based on valor, service, or achievement, the DA 1059 evaluates the academic and leadership skills critical for military advancement, both integral to a soldier’s career development.

Completing the DA Form 1059, a Service School Academic Evaluation Report, is an important responsibility. It reflects a soldier's performance and potential through the course. Here are some dos and don'ts to consider for an accurate and effective completion of the form:

• Review instructions carefully: Before filling out the form, thoroughly understand the guidelines provided by AR 623-3 to ensure compliance and accuracy.
• Be accurate and detailed: When entering personal information and course details, double-check for accuracy. Provide specific examples in the comments sections to support ratings.
• Maintain objectivity: Evaluate performance based on empirical evidence and established criteria. Avoid letting personal relationships or biases influence ratings.
• Use clear language: Write comments and explanations in clear, concise language that can be easily understood by those reviewing the form.
• Secure the necessary signatures: Ensure that the form is properly authenticated by obtaining all required signatures in the designated sections to validate the evaluation.

• Leave fields blank: Fill out all applicable sections of the form. If a section is not applicable, mark it as such rather than leaving it empty.
• Exaggerate or underplay performance: Provide an honest assessment of the soldier's abilities and achievements, avoiding the temptation to inflate or diminish their performance.
• Ignore instructions for comments: When the form requires comments for certain ratings or decisions, do not skip this step. The comments provide context and support for your assessments.
• Rush the process: Take your time to reflect on the soldier's performance throughout the course to provide a fair and comprehensive evaluation.
• Violate privacy: Be mindful of privacy concerns, especially when handling sensitive personal information. Follow all protocols for secure handling and submission of the form.

Adhering to these guidelines ensures that the DA Form 1059 serves as a reliable and professional record of a soldier's performance and potential within the educational and training contexts of the service.

When it comes to understanding the DA Form 1059, or the Service School Academic Evaluation Report, several misconceptions commonly arise. It's vital to correct these misunderstandings to ensure accurate completion and interpretation of this crucial document within the military education and training system.

• Only negative performances are documented: A common misconception is that the DA Form 1059 is used solely to report poor performances. In reality, this form is designed to document a wide range of performance metrics, from unsatisfactory to superior, enabling a comprehensive assessment of an individual's abilities and contributions during their course.

• Comments are optional: Some believe that providing comments in Item 14 is optional and only necessary for certain ratings. However, comments are essential for supporting superior and unsatisfactory ratings and are required to explain a "no" response to a student's potential for higher-level training (Item 13). These narrative comments offer invaluable context that numbers and checkboxes cannot convey.

• The form is only about academic performance: While academic performance is a significant focus of the DA Form 1059, it also evaluates other critical areas such as leadership skills, oral and written communication, and group work contribution. This comprehensive approach ensures a well-rounded view of an individual's capabilities.

• Any course instructor can complete the form: Filling out a DA Form 1059 is not a task for any instructor. It requires inputs from individuals who have been designated as the rater and reviewing officer, ensuring the evaluations are made by those with adequate oversight of the student's performance and potential.

• It's only for Army use: Although primarily used by the Army, as indicated by the "For use of this form, see AR 623-3; the proponent agency is DCS, G-1," the DA Form 1059's structure and purpose serve as a model for evaluating service school performances across different branches, adapting to each's specific needs and standards.

• Referred reports are uncommon: Referred reports, as highlighted in the section asking if the evaluated individual wishes to make comments, are not as rare as some might think. They occur when a report negatively impacts one's career, such as unsatisfactory ratings in key areas, making the option to comment an important part of the process.

• The form is static and unchanging: The DA Form 1059 has undergone various revisions, with the March 2006 version currently in use being designated as "PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE." This emphasizes the evolving nature of the form to better capture the performance and potential of service school students over time.

Ensuring a clear understanding of the DA Form 1059's purpose, requirements, and processes is essential for accurately documenting and interpreting service school performances. By dispelling these seven misconceptions, individuals can contribute to a more effective and fair evaluation system.

The DA 1059 form, also known as the Service School Academic Evaluation Report, is a document used in the military to evaluate a service member's performance in a formal course of instruction. Understanding how to properly fill out and use this form is crucial for accurate record-keeping and assessment. Here are eight key takeaways to guide individuals in correctly handling the DA 1059 form:

• Ensure all personal information is accurately entered, including last name, first name, middle initial, social security number (SSN), grade, branch (BR), and specialty/MOSC. Mistakes in this section could lead to identification errors and administrative complications.
• Correctly identify the course title, name of school, and the course’s duration including the start and end dates. Dates should be in the YYYYMMDD format for consistency and clarity.
• Understand the significance of Item 9, which asks if this is a referred report and if the service member wishes to make comments. A referred report usually indicates areas of concern that might need addressing.
• Fill out the Performance Summary and Demonstrated Abilities sections with great care. These sections require evaluators to assess the service member’s written and oral communication, leadership skills, contribution to group work, and research ability. Remember, certain ratings such as "SUPERIOR" or "UNSAT" (unsatisfactory) must be supported by comments in the comments section (Item 14).
• The inquiry about whether the student demonstrated academic potential for selection to higher-level schooling/training is critical. A "NO" response here must be supported by detailed comments in Item 14, explaining the rationale behind this assessment.
• The comments section (Item 14) plays a pivotal role in providing nuanced feedback and justification for the ratings given. Always include constructive, specific, and objective comments that support the evaluations made in the previous sections.
• The authentication section requires the typed name, grade, branch, and title of both the rater and the reviewing officer, along with their signatures and the date of signing. It's essential for the integrity of the evaluation and its acceptance in official records.
• Finally, once completed, ensure that the form is properly processed in accordance with AR 623-3 regulations, and all involved parties have access to or receive copies as necessary. This ensures transparency and acknowledges the service member’s right to review their evaluations.

Properly filling out the DA 1059 form is a responsibility that affects a service member's military career trajectory and opportunities for advancement. Paying attention to detail and following these guidelines will help ensure that every evaluation is fair, accurate, and constructive.