The UD-105 form, known officially as the Answer—Unlawful Detainer form, is a critical document for defendants in eviction proceedings within the Superior Court of California. It allows them to formally respond to an eviction complaint filed against them, offering options to deny allegations, state defenses, and object to claims made by the plaintiff. Given the complexities and the potential impact on your living situation, it’s paramount to understand and fill out the form carefully.
Ready to safeguard your housing? Click the button below to get started on your UD-105 form.
Navigating the complexities of an eviction procedure can feel like traversing a legal labyrinth, especially for tenants striving to understand their rights and construct a solid defense. Central to this process is the UD-105 form, a critical document used in California's judicial system whenever a tenant decides to contest an eviction. This legal form, officially known as the "Answer—Unlawful Detainer," acts as the defendant's formal response to the eviction notice served by the landlord. It encompasses a variety of defenses and counterclaims that tenants may levy against their landlords, ranging from allegations of habitability violations to claims of retaliation or discrimination. The UD-105 form allows tenants to deny the allegations stated in the eviction complaint explicitly or generally, provide a detailed account of their defenses, request court actions such as repairs to be made or attorney's fees to be awarded, and even highlight issues with the way the lawsuit was initiated, such as improper notice. Furthermore, the form takes into account the intricate nuances of California's tenant protection laws, including measures specific to COVID-19 relief and the CARES Act. Filling out the UD-105 accurately and comprehensively is crucial, as it serves as the foundational document that shapes the trajectory of the tenant's legal battle to remain in their home.
UD-105
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY
STATE BAR NUMBER:
FOR COURT USE ONLY
NAME:
FIRM NAME:
STREET ADDRESS:
CITY:
STATE:
ZIP CODE:
TELEPHONE NO.:
FAX NO.:
EMAIL ADDRESS:
ATTORNEY FOR (name):
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND ZIP CODE:
BRANCH NAME:
PLAINTIFF:
DEFENDANT:
ANSWER—UNLAWFUL DETAINER
CASE NUMBER:
1.Defendant (all defendants for whom this answer is filed must be named and must sign this answer unless their attorney signs):
answers the complaint as follows:
2.DENIALS (Check ONLY ONE of the next two boxes.)
a.
General Denial (Do not check this box if the complaint demands more than $1,000.)
Defendant generally denies each statement of the complaint and of the Mandatory Cover Sheet and Supplemental Allegations—Unlawful Detainer (form UD-101).
b. Specific Denials (Check this box and complete (1) and (2) below if complaint demands more than $1,000.) Defendant admits that all of the statements of the complaint and of the Mandatory Cover Sheet and Supplemental Allegations—Unlawful Detainer (form UD-101) are true EXCEPT:
(1)Denial of Allegations in Complaint (Form UD-100 or Other Complaint for Unlawful Detainer)
(a)Defendant claims the following statements of the complaint are false (state paragraph numbers from the complaint or explain below or, if more room needed, on form MC-025):
Explanation is on form MC-025, titled as Attachment 2b(1)(a).
(b)Defendant has no information or belief that the following statements of the complaint are true, so defendant denies them (state paragraph numbers from the complaint or explain below or, if more room needed, on form MC-025):
Explanation is on form MC-025, titled as Attachment 2b(1)(b).
(2)Denial of Allegations in Mandatory Cover Sheet and Supplemental Allegations—Unlawful Detainer (form UD-101)
(a)
Defendant did not receive plaintiff's Mandatory Cover Sheet and Supplemental Allegations (form UD-101). (If not checked, complete (b), (c), and (d), as appropriate.)
(b)
Defendant claims the statements in the Verification required for issuance of summons—residential, item 3 of plaintiff's Mandatory Cover Sheet and Supplemental Allegations (form UD-101), are false.
(c)Defendant claims the following statements on the Mandatory Cover Sheet and Supplemental Allegations—Unlawful Detainer (form UD-101) are false (state paragraph numbers from form UD-101 or explain below or, if more room
needed, on form MC-025):
Explanation is on form MC-025, titled as Attachment 2b(2)(c).
Page 1 of 5
Form Approved for Optional Use
Civil Code, § 1940 et seq.;
Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 425.12,
Judicial Council of California
1161 et seq., 1179.01 et seq.
UD-105 [Rev. October 1, 2021]
www.courts.ca.gov
2.b. (2) (d) Defendant has no information or belief that the following statements on the Mandatory Cover Sheet and Supplemental Allegations—Unlawful Detainer (form UD-101) are true, so defendant denies them (state paragraph numbers from form UD-101 or explain below or, if more room needed, on form MC-025):
Explanation is on form MC-025, titled as Attachment 2b(2)(d).
3.DEFENSES AND OBJECTIONS (NOTE: For each box checked, you must state brief facts to support it in item 3w (on page 4) or, if more room is needed, on form MC-025. You can learn more about defenses and objections at www.courts.ca.gov/selfhelp-eviction.htm.)
(Nonpayment of rent only) Plaintiff has breached the warranty to provide habitable premises.
(Nonpayment of rent only) Defendant made needed repairs and properly deducted the cost from the rent, and plaintiff did
b.
not give proper credit.
c.
(Nonpayment of rent only) On (date):
before the notice to pay or quit expired, defendant offered
the rent due but plaintiff would not accept it.
d.
Plaintiff waived, changed, or canceled the notice to quit.
Plaintiff served defendant with the notice to quit or filed the complaint to retaliate against defendant.
e.
By serving defendant with the notice to quit or filing the complaint, plaintiff is arbitrarily discriminating against the
f.
defendant in violation of the Constitution or the laws of the United States or California.
Plaintiff's demand for possession violates the local rent control or eviction control ordinance of (city or county, title of
g.
ordinance, and date of passage):
(Also, briefly state in item 3w the facts showing violation of the ordinance.)
Plaintiff's demand for possession is subject to the Tenant Protection Act of 2019, Civil Code section 1946.2 or 1947.12,
h.
and is not in compliance with the act. (Check all that apply and briefly state in item 3w the facts that support each.)
(1)
Plaintiff failed to state a just cause for termination of tenancy in the written notice to terminate.
(2)
Plaintiff failed to provide an opportunity to cure any alleged violations of terms and conditions of the lease (other than
payment of rent) as required under Civil Code section 1946.2(c).
(3)
Plaintiff failed to comply with the relocation assistance requirements of Civil Code section 1946.2(d).
(4)
Plaintiff has raised the rent more than the amount allowed under Civil Code section 1947.12, and the only unpaid rent
is the unauthorized amount.
(5)
Plaintiff violated the Tenant Protection Act in another manner that defeats the complaint.
Plaintiff accepted rent from defendant to cover a period of time after the date the notice to quit expired.
i.
Plaintiff seeks to evict defendant based on an act against defendant or a member of defendant's household that
j.
constitutes domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, human trafficking, or abuse of an elder or a dependent adult. (This
defense requires one of the following: (1) a temporary restraining order, protective order, or police report that is not
more than 180 days old; OR (2) a signed statement from a qualified third party (e.g., a doctor, domestic violence or
sexual assault counselor, human trafficking caseworker, or psychologist) concerning the injuries or abuse resulting from
these acts).)
Plaintiff seeks to evict defendant based on defendant or another person calling the police or emergency assistance (e.g.,
k.
ambulance) by or on behalf of a victim of abuse, a victim of crime, or an individual in an emergency when defendant or
the other person believed that assistance was necessary.
Plaintiff's demand for possession of a residential property is in retaliation for nonpayment of rent or other financial
l.
obligations due between March 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021, even though alleged to be based on other reasons.
(Civ. Code, § 1942.5(d); Gov. Code, § 12955.)
m.
Plaintiff's demand for possession of a residential property is based on nonpayment of rent or other financial obligations
due between March 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021, and (check all that apply):
Plaintiff did not serve the general notice or notices of rights under the COVID-19 Tenant Relief Act as required by
Code of Civil Procedure section 1179.04.
Plaintiff did not serve the required 15-day notice. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1179.03(b) or (c).)
Page 2 of 5
3. m. (3)
(6)
(c)
Plaintiff did not provide an unsigned declaration of COVID-19–related financial distress with the 15-day notice. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1179.03(d).)
Plaintiff did not provide an unsigned declaration of COVID-19–related financial distress in the language in which the landlord was required to provide a translation of the rental agreement. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1179.03(d).)
Plaintiff identified defendant as a “high-income tenant” in the 15-day notice, but plaintiff did not possess proof at the time the notice was served establishing that defendant met the definition of high-income tenant. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1179.02.5(b).)
Defendant delivered to plaintiff one or more declarations of COVID-19–related financial distress and, if required as a "high-income tenant," documentation in support. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1179.03(f) and 1179.02.5.)
(Describe when and how delivered and check all other items below that apply):
Plaintiff's demand for payment includes late fees on rent or other financial obligations due between March 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021.
Plaintiff's demand for payment includes fees for services that were increased or not previously charged.
Defendant, on or before September 30, 2021, paid or offered plaintiff payment of at least 25% of the total rental payments that were due between September 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021, and that were demanded in the termination notices for which defendant delivered the declarations described in (a). (Code Civ. Proc.,
§ 1179.03(g)(2).)
(7)
n.
Defendant is currently filing or has already filed a declaration of COVID-19–related financial distress with the court. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1179.03(h).)
Plaintiff's demand for possession of a residential property is based on nonpayment of rent or other financial obligations due between October 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022, and (check all that apply):
Plaintiff's notice to quit did not contain the required contact information for the pertinent governmental rental assistance program, or the other content required by Code of Civil Procedure section 1179.10(a). Plaintiff's notice to quit did not include a translation of the statutorily required notice. (Code Civ. Proc.,
§ 1179.10(a)(2) and Civ. Code, § 1632.)
o.
p.
For a tenancy initially established before October 1, 2021, plaintiff's demand for possession of a residential property is based on nonpayment of rent or other financial obligations due between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2022, and (check all that apply):
Plaintiff did not complete an application for rental assistance to cover the rental debt demanded in the complaint before filing the complaint in this action.
Plaintiff's application for rental assistance was not denied.
Plaintiff's application for rental assistance was denied for a reason that does not support issuance of a summons or judgment in an unlawful detainer action (check all that apply):
(a) Plaintiff did not fully or properly complete plaintiff's portion of the application. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1179.09(d)(2)(A).)
Plaintiff did not apply to the correct rental assistance program. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1179.09(d)(2)(C).)
Rental assistance has been approved and tenant is separately filing an application to prevent forfeiture (form UD-125).
Plaintiff's demand for possession of a residential property is based on nonpayment of rent or other financial obligations and (check all that apply):
Plaintiff received or has a pending application for rental assistance from a governmental rental assistance program or some other source relating to the amount claimed in the notice to pay rent or quit. (Health & Saf. Code,
§§ 50897.1(d)(2)(B) and 50897.3(e)(2).)
Plaintiff received or has a pending application for rental assistance from a governmental rental assistance program or some other source for rent accruing since the notice to pay rent or quit. (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 50897.1(d)(2)(B) and 50897.3(e)(2).)
Plaintiff's demand for possession is based only on late fees for defendant's failure to provide landlord payment within 15 days of receiving governmental rental assistance. (Health & Saf. Code, § 50897.1(e)(2)(B).)
Page 3 of 5
3. q. Plaintiff violated the COVID-19 Tenant Relief Act (Code Civ. Proc., § 1179.01 et seq.) or a local COVID-19–related ordinance regarding evictions in some other way (briefly state facts describing this in item 3w).
r. The property is covered by the federal CARES Act and the plaintiff did not provide 30 days' notice to vacate. (Property covered by the CARES Act means property where the landlord:
•is participating in a covered housing program as defined by the Violence Against Women Act;
•is participating in the rural housing voucher program under section 542 of the Housing Act of 1949; or
•has a federally backed mortgage loan or a federally backed multifamily mortgage loan.)
s. Plaintiff improperly applied payments made by defendant in a tenancy that was in existence between March 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021 (Code Civ. Proc., § 1179.04.5), as follows (check all that apply):
(1) Plaintiff applied a security deposit to rent, or other financial obligations due, without tenant’s written agreement.
(2) Plaintiff applied a monthly rental payment to rent or other financial obligations that were due between March 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021, other than to the prospective month’s rent, without tenant’s written agreement.
t. Plaintiff refused to accept payment from a third party for rent due. (Civ. Code, § 1947.3; Gov. Code, § 12955.)
u. Defendant has a disability and plaintiff refused to provide a reasonable accommodation that was requested. (Cal. Code Regs,. tit. 2, § 12176(c).)
v. Other defenses and objections are stated in item 3w.
w.(Provide facts for each item checked above, either below or, if more room needed, on form MC-025):
Description of facts or defenses are on form MC-025, titled as Attachment 3w.
4. OTHER STATEMENTS
Defendant vacated the premises on (date):
b. The fair rental value of the premises alleged in the complaint is excessive (explain below or, if more room needed, on form MC-025):
Explanation is on form MC-025, titled as Attachment 4b.
Other (specify below or, if more room needed, on form MC-025):
Other statements are on form MC-025, titled as Attachment 4c.
5.DEFENDANT REQUESTS
a.that plaintiff take nothing requested in the complaint.
b.costs incurred in this proceeding.
reasonable attorney fees.
that plaintiff be ordered to (1) make repairs and correct the conditions that constitute a breach of the warranty to provide
habitable premises and (2) reduce the monthly rent to a reasonable rental value until the conditions are corrected.
Page 4 of 5
5. e.
Other (specify below or on form MC-025):
All other requests are stated on form MC-025, titled as Attachment 5e.
6. Number of pages attached:
UNLAWFUL DETAINER ASSISTANT (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 6400–6415)
7. (Must be completed in all cases.) An unlawful detainer assistant
did not
did
for compensation give advice or
assistance with this form. (If defendant has received any help or advice for pay from an unlawful detainer assistant, state):
Assistant's name:
Telephone number:
Street address, city, and zip code:
County of registration:
e. Registration number:
f. Expiration date:
(Each defendant for whom this answer is filed must be named in item 1 and must sign this answer unless defendant's attorney signs.)
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
(SIGNATURE OF DEFENDANT OR ATTORNEY)
VERIFICATION
(Use a different verification form if the verification is by an attorney or for a corporation or partnership.)
I am the defendant in this proceeding and have read this answer. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Date:
(SIGNATURE OF DEFENDANT)
Page 5 of 5
For your protection and privacy, please press the Clear This Form button after you have printed the form.
Print this form Save this form
Clear this form
Filling out the UD-105 form, also known as the Answer–Unlawful Detainer form, is a crucial step for tenants in responding to an eviction notice in California. This document is your opportunity to present your side of the story to the court. It requires careful attention to detail and accuracy to ensure your response is correctly recorded. Below is a straightforward guide to help you complete the form accurately. Once submitted, the court will use this information to assess your case.
After filling out the form, review all entered information for accuracy and completeness. Make sure to attach any additional pages or documents referenced in your answers. Once the form is ready, you'll need to file it with the court and serve a copy to the plaintiff or their attorney. The exact process may vary by county, so check with your local court for specific instructions on how to submit your Answer–Unlawful Detainer (UD-105) form.
What is a UD-105 form?
The UD-105 form, also known as the "Answer—Unlawful Detainer," is a legal document used in the state of California. This form allows defendants in eviction cases (unlawful detainer actions) to formally respond to the complaint filed by the landlord (plaintiff). Through this document, defendants can deny allegations made against them, outline their defenses, and raise any claims or rights they believe are relevant to the dispute.
How do I fill out the UD-105 form?
To properly fill out the UD-105 form, start by entering your personal information and the case details at the top of the form. You will then need to decide whether to make a general denial of all allegations if the complaint seeks $1,000 or less, or provide specific denials if the complaint involves a larger sum. You should also check boxes relevant to your defenses or objections, providing brief explanations as required on the form. If additional space is needed, attach a separate sheet (form MC-025). Lastly, review the "Other Statements" and "Defendant Requests" sections to make any additional claims or requests for relief, and don't forget to sign the form. It's advisable to seek legal counsel to ensure all relevant defenses and objections are accurately captured.
Where do I file the completed UD-105 form?
The completed UD-105 form should be filed with the clerk of the Superior Court of California in the county where the unlawful detainer complaint was filed against you. You must ensure timely filing as per the deadline, which is typically five court days after the service of the summons and complaint. It is important to note that failing to file the answer within this timeframe could result in a default judgment against you, potentially leading to eviction.
Can I request a jury trial with UD-105 form?
Yes, defendants in unlawful detainer actions have the right to request a jury trial in California. To indicate this preference, make sure you check the appropriate box in the "Defendant Requests" section of the UD-105 form. This action notifies the court of your desire to have the matters disputed before a jury rather than just a judge. Keep in mind, opting for a jury trial may involve additional fees and preparation time. It is crucial to inform the court of this request promptly to ensure your right to a jury trial is preserved.
Filling out the UD-105 form, also known as the Answer to Unlawful Detainer, necessitates attention to detail and thoroughness. Unfortunately, mistakes are common and can significantly impact the outcome of an eviction process. One major error people make is not correctly identifying all parties involved. Each defendant named in the eviction complaint must also be named in the answer and must sign the form unless represented by an attorney. Overlooking this detail can lead to incomplete representation in court.
Another frequent mistake is choosing between a "General Denial" and "Specific Denials" improperly. A General Denial is only appropriate if the complaint demands $1,000 or less, a detail often missed, leading to incorrect responses in the answer. Specific Denials require a detailed rebuttal of the claims, where misunderstanding the requirement can weaken one's defense.
Incorrectly handling the 'DEFENSES AND OBJECTIONS' section is also a common error. Respondents often check boxes without providing the necessary supporting facts or documents. The form clearly states that for each defense checked, a brief fact must be stated in item 3w or attached as a separate document if more space is needed. Failing to provide these facts can lead to the court overlooking potential defenses.
Many respondents do not leverage the 'Other Statements' and 'Defendant Requests' sections to their full potential. These sections allow for explaining circumstances or requests that don't neatly fit into predefined checkboxes, such as detailing extenuating circumstances that might sway the court's judgment. Skipping these sections can result in missed opportunities to communicate critical information to the court.
Another area often mishandled is the verification section towards the end of the form. Each defendant is required to sign the answer, verifying under penalty of perjury that the information provided is true and correct. Sometimes, defendants overlook this requirement or fail to have each relevant party sign, casting doubt on the answer's validity.
Inconsistent or incorrect information across different forms and attachments is a common misstep. For the court to assess the case accurately, information provided on form UD-105 and any attachments, such as MC-025, must be consistent. Discrepancies can confuse the issues at hand and potentially harm the defendant’s credibility.
Last but certainly not least, failing to attach additional documents when needed is a critical error. Whether it's attaching a declaration of COVID-19–related financial distress or evidence supporting specific denials or defenses, not providing these documents can significantly weaken the answer. This oversight underscores the importance of thoroughly reviewing the form instructions and ensuring all relevant documents are attached before submission.
When dealing with a UD-105 form, which is the response to an unlawful detainer (eviction) notice in California, it's essential to gather and prepare several other forms and documents that support or are mandated by the legal process involved. Each document serves a distinct purpose, contributing to a comprehensive defense or claim in an unlawful detainer proceeding. Understanding these forms can alleviate some of the stress and confusion often associated with legal proceedings.
While the legal terrain of eviction proceedings may seem daunting, these forms provide a structured path through the process. By familiarizing oneself with these documents and their purposes, individuals can navigate their circumstances with greater confidence and clarity. Remember, consulting with a legal professional can provide personalized guidance tailored to your specific situation.
The UD-105 form, a document integral to answering a complaint regarding unlawful detainer in California, shares similarities with other legal documents used in housing disputes and beyond. These documents facilitate structured communication between parties and the court, ensuring that individuals can assert their rights and respond to claims made against them. While each document serves its unique purpose within the legal system, their functions often overlap, reflecting the interconnected nature of law.
One comparable document is the Complaint for Unlawful Detainer (Form UD-100), which initiates the process that the UD-105 form responds to. Both serve vital roles in the legal proceedings surrounding disputes between landlords and tenants. While the UD-100 form lays out the landlord's claims against the tenant, the UD-105 form allows tenants to formally counter these allegations, either denying them in whole, in part, or presenting a different narrative.
The Answer to Complaint (Form PLD-C-010) is another document paralleling the UD-105, used in a broader range of civil litigation beyond housing disputes. Though its application is more extensive, the core purpose aligns with that of the UD-105: it offers defendants a structured means to contend against a plaintiff's claims, articulate defenses, and list counter-requests, allowing defendants to clarify their positions and legal arguments.
The Case Management Statement (Form CM-110), while utilized at a different stage of the litigation process, shares the UD-105's aim of streamlining and clarifying issues for the court. It requires parties to detail the case's status, share discovery efforts, and outline settlement possibilities, effectively preparing the court for efficient management of the case ahead.
Similarly, the Civil Case Cover Sheet (Form CM-010) acts as an introductory outline for new civil cases, akin to how the UD-105 form outlines a defendant’s stance in unlawful detainer actions. By providing a snapshot of the case type and the involved parties, it aids the court in directing the case to the appropriate department.
The Request for Dismissal (Form CIV-110) offers an interesting contrast to the UD-105. Where the UD-105 is about contestation, the CIV-110 moves towards resolution, allowing a plaintiff to dismiss part or all of a case against a defendant. Despite their differing intents, both forms demonstrate the procedural steps parties must take to advance their positions or resolve disputes within the legal system.
The Proof of Service by Mail (Form POS-030) shares with the UD-105 the critical role of formally communicating legal actions and positions. While the UD-105 submits a defendant's response to the court, the POS-030 certifies that documents have been delivered to another party, ensuring all participants are informed of the proceedings and have a chance to respond.
Declaration (Form MC-030) resembles the UD-105 in its provision for parties to make detailed statements under oath. Both allow individuals to elaborate on their circumstances, present facts, and argue their case directly to the court, reinforcing the importance of personal narrative in legal disputes.
Finally, the Application for Change of Name (Form NC-100) exhibits the legal system's capacity to accommodate individuals' needs through structured forms. Similar to the UD-105’s role in disputes, the NC-100 allows individuals to petition for a personal change, demonstrating the diverse functionalities of standardized legal forms in facilitating court processes and acknowledging individual circumstances.
When dealing with the UD-105 form, the Answer—Unlawful Detainer, it’s important to navigate the process with precision and care. Here’s a guide highlighting the essential do's and don'ts:
Completing the UD-105 form accurately and comprehensively is crucial for tenants facing an unlawful detainer lawsuit. Paying careful attention to detail and following the guidelines above can help navigate the process more effectively.
There are several common misconceptions about filling out and filing the UD-105 form, which is used in California for defendants to respond to an unlawful detainer (eviction) complaint. Understanding these misconceptions is crucial for tenants to protect their rights effectively. Here are eight misconceptions clarified:
It's essential for tenants facing an unlawful detainer action to understand these points fully to ensure their rights are protected throughout the eviction process. Misunderstandings can lead to missed opportunities to contest an eviction effectively.
Filling out and using the UD-105 form, or Answer—Unlawful Detainer, is crucial in responding to an eviction notice in California. Here are key takeaways to guide you:
Addressing an eviction notice with the UD-105 form is a structured process that allows tenants to confidently state their case. Accurate completion and timely filing are critical to successfully contest an unlawful detainer action.
Central Registry Release of Information Form - The Central Registry Release of Information Form is a crucial step for individuals seeking employment in sensitive positions involving children.
Commercial Invoice - Features a section for discounts, allowing businesses to document any deductions straightforwardly.